Vanishing Planet: GJ 3470b's Disappearing Atmosphere

Space
Vanishing Planet: GJ 3470b's Disappearing Atmosphere
Hubble observations show the Neptune-sized exoplanet GJ 3470b leaking a giant hydrogen cloud and shedding mass at a record rate. Astronomers say the planet may be on a long path to becoming a stripped rocky core.

A vanishing world seen in ultraviolet

For astronomers peering in ultraviolet light, a Neptune-sized world some 96 light-years away looks less like a planet and more like a comet. Hubble Space Telescope spectra reveal a vast cloud of neutral hydrogen surrounding GJ 3470b, blown off the planet and streaming into space; the signal is strong enough that researchers estimate the planet has already lost a sizable fraction of its original mass and is evaporating faster than any comparable world yet studied.

How the signal was found

The detection comes from repeated observations of GJ 3470b’s transit across its red-dwarf host star, taken in the Lyman-α line of hydrogen as part of the Panchromatic Comparative Exoplanet Treasury (PanCET) program. The Hubble data show deep, repeatable absorption during transit: roughly 35% in the blue wing of the line and 23% in the red wing, signatures that point to a large, structured envelope of neutral hydrogen reaching well beyond the planet’s Roche lobe. These measurements allowed the team to model escaping material and infer a contemporary neutral-hydrogen loss rate on the order of 10^10 grams per second.

Physics of escape: heating, radiation pressure and Roche limits

Close-in planets are bathed in their star’s X-ray and extreme-ultraviolet radiation (XUV). That energy heats the upper atmosphere, driving it into hydrodynamic flow: the gas expands until individual particles escape the planet’s gravity. For GJ 3470b this process is amplified because the world is relatively low density and orbits a young, active M-dwarf, so the star’s radiation pressure and high-energy flux push neutral hydrogen away at high speeds. Numerical simulations that combine observed stellar irradiation with particle dynamics reproduce the Hubble absorption signatures and imply the planet is losing material far faster than previously measured warm Neptunes.

Exosphere shape gives a clue to the dynamics

GJ 3470b’s absorption is asymmetric in velocity, with both blue- and redshifted components. That pattern—an extended blue wing indicating atoms being accelerated away from the star and a red wing consistent with dense, slow-moving gas—suggests multiple regions in the escaping flow. The analysis favors an ellipsoidal, elongated thermosphere that can extend tens of planetary radii ahead of and behind the planet, and it may include a shocked layer where outflowing planetary gas collides with the stellar wind. These geometric details are what let astronomers move from a mere detection of a cloud to an estimate of the mass-loss history.

How much has already gone, and what the future may hold

Projecting the inferred escape rate backward under reasonable assumptions about the star’s past activity, the team estimates that GJ 3470b may already have lost between roughly 4% and 35% of its current total mass over its roughly two‑billion‑year lifetime—and that fraction could be larger if the star was dramatically brighter in XUV when young. Continued escape at comparable average rates could strip the planet of most of its hydrogen envelope in a few billion years, leaving behind a much smaller, rocky core—one evolutionary path that may help explain why so few Neptune‑sized planets are observed very close to their stars. The calculations carry substantial uncertainties, however: mass‑loss rates depend on the uncertain history of stellar activity, the composition and thermal structure of the atmosphere, and interactions with the stellar wind.

Context: the evaporation desert and population evolution

Exoplanet surveys have long noted a relative dearth of intermediate-sized planets at short orbital distances—a feature sometimes called the "evaporation desert." One explanation is that many warm Neptunes formed with thick hydrogen/helium envelopes but were whittled down to super‑Earths and mini‑Neptunes by sustained atmospheric escape. GJ 3470b sits close to that desert’s edge, and its vivid ongoing loss provides a direct, observable example of the erosion mechanism in action. Comparing GJ 3470b to the better-known evaporating Neptune GJ 436b shows that escape behaviour can vary widely between similar planets because of differences in density and host‑star activity.

Observational challenges and why ultraviolet is critical

Studying hydrogen escape relies on ultraviolet spectroscopy, and that presents a major observational limitation: the interstellar medium scatters and absorbs Lyman-α, so only relatively nearby systems—within roughly 150 light‑years and with favourable lines of sight—are accessible. Hubble’s ultraviolet capability has therefore been essential, and the PanCET program’s multi-epoch approach made it possible to separate planetary signals from stellar variability and instrumental effects. Complementary tracers, like helium seen in the infrared, bypass some of the Lyman-α limitations and are accessible to instruments such as the James Webb Space Telescope and ground-based spectrographs tuned to helium lines; those observations are a high priority because they can probe lower-velocity regions of the flow and help close the bookkeeping on total mass loss.

Open questions and next steps

Despite the clarity of the Hubble signal, key uncertainties remain. Translating a measured neutral‑hydrogen loss rate to a total atmospheric-mass loss requires assumptions about the ionization balance and the fraction of heavier species carried away in the outflow. The star’s high-energy history—how luminous it was in XUV when it was young—dominates estimates of integrated mass loss and is only indirectly constrained. Going forward, astronomers plan multi-wavelength follow-up: helium searches in the infrared, additional ultraviolet monitoring to check for long‑term stability or changes linked to stellar activity, and comparative surveys that expand the sample of warm Neptunes observed in Lyman‑α. Together these observations will refine the role of evaporation in sculpting exoplanet populations.

GJ 3470b is therefore both a laboratory and a warning: under the relentless influence of a nearby star, a world can slowly peel itself into something entirely different. That evolution—messy, extended and visible if you know where to look—may be a common chapter in the life stories of many planets orbiting small, active stars.

Sources

  • Astronomy & Astrophysics (research paper: "Hubble PanCET: an extended upper atmosphere of neutral hydrogen around the warm Neptune GJ 3470b").
  • Johns Hopkins University / PanCET press materials on Hubble observations of GJ 3470b.
  • Space Telescope Science Institute (Hubble mission support and PanCET program documentation).
James Lawson

James Lawson

Investigative science and tech reporter focusing on AI, space industry and quantum breakthroughs

University College London (UCL) • United Kingdom

🎯 Readers Questions Answered

Q What did Hubble observe about GJ 3470b's atmosphere?
A Hubble’s ultraviolet spectroscopy of GJ 3470b revealed a vast cloud of neutral hydrogen surrounding the planet, streaming away into space and creating a measurable transit signal in Lyman-α (Lyman-alpha). The absorption during transit is about 35% in the blue wing and 23% in the red wing, implying a detached, extended hydrogen envelope and a high mass loss rate near 10^10 grams per second.
Q What drives the atmosphere loss on GJ 3470b?
A The loss is driven by the star’s high-energy X-ray and extreme-ultraviolet radiation, which heats the planet’s upper atmosphere and drives hydrodynamic escape. The planet’s low density and the host star’s activity boost radiation pressure, pushing neutral hydrogen outward at high speeds. Numerical models that include irradiation and particle dynamics reproduce the observed absorption features.
Q How much mass has GJ 3470b already lost, and what could happen next?
A Analyses indicate GJ 3470b may have already shed roughly 4% to 35% of its current mass over its about two‑billion‑year lifetime. The exact amount depends on the star’s past XUV brightness and the atmosphere’s properties. If escape continues at similar rates, most of the planet’s hydrogen envelope could be removed in a few billion years, leaving a rocky core.
Q What uncertainties exist and what follow-up observations are planned?
A Despite clear evidence of hydrogen escape, uncertainties remain in converting the measured neutral-hydrogen loss to total mass loss, because ionization balance, heavier species, and the star’s historical activity are not precisely known. Future work includes infrared helium measurements, extended ultraviolet monitoring, and comparative surveys across similar warm Neptunes to refine how evaporation shapes exoplanet populations.

Have a question about this article?

Questions are reviewed before publishing. We'll answer the best ones!